報道の自由は事実を報道するは自由である。だが自分が感じた事を報道するの

報道の自由は事実を報道するは自由である。だが自分が感じた事を報道するのは自由では
ありません。自分は感じましたと言う断りを付けて報道するのは自由であります。アサド大統領は罪のない人々を攻撃して殺したと言う報道が何十回もありました。殺したと言う証拠はどこにもありません。殺す必要がありません。攻撃をかけてきたから反撃をしてその巻き添えに多くの犠牲者を出した。と言うのが正しい報道なのでありま。間違った報道でシリアを悪い国に煽り立て、これまでで２５万余人もの犠牲者を出すに至ったではないか？

結果 (英語) 1:

Freedom of the press to report facts, aButton. But is free to report on what I felt myselfYou do not. To say I felt the coverage is free. News reports say President Bashar Al-Assad to attack innocent people and killed dozens of times. Say killed proof is nowhere to be found. Do not kill. Came over the attack and fight back then, the collateral damage of many deaths. A correctly and press well. Fuelling bad country with Syria in the wrong coverage is reached in making their victims more than 250000 people so far?

結果 (英語) 2:

Freedom of the press is free to report the facts. But to report that he felt it is a freedom
not. It is free to report with a specified otherwise to say that he felt. President Assad is reported to say that killing by attacking innocent people there were dozens of times. Where it does not have any evidence to say that it killed. There is no need to kill. We put a lot of victims in the collateral by the fight back because I have been multiplied by the attack. And while is is the right coverage to say. And fueled a Syria in the wrong coverage to poor countries, or not to have come to give the victims of the 250,000 extra people in to this?

結果 (英語) 3:

Freedom of the press to report the fact to be free. But not at liberty to reports that one feels. There are free to coverage declined to say I felt. There were dozens of times report says the attack killed innocent people and President Assad. The evidence says killed won't go anywhere. There is no need to kill. Because you have to attack and counterattack of many casualties in its involvement. They say the correct coverage in there.Bad news make bad influence on Syria country, not yet reached out to more than 25 million victims? At