2.1 長さの縮みと時計の遅れと質量の増大 はじめに空間（長さや距離）

2.1 長さの縮みと時計の遅れと質量の増大
はじめに空間（長さや距離）と時間（時計）と質量について考える．特殊相対性理論では，静止慣性系における物体の長さ☆はその物体がその静止慣性系に対して速度☆で運動しているとき，その運動方向に，光速を☆として☆に縮み（ローレンツ収縮し）短くなり，運動方向と垂直方向には何ら縮まず☆のままである．また同じく静止慣性系における時計の刻み☆は，その時計がその静止慣性系に対して速度☆で運動しているとき☆に遅れてゆっくり刻むようになる．さらに同じく静止慣性系における物体の質量☆は，その物体がその静止慣性系に対して速度☆で運動しているとき☆に増大する．
ここでこの長さの☆への縮みや時計の☆への遅れや質量の☆への増大は，本当に実際に実在的に縮んだり遅れたり増大したりするものか，そうではなくて観測的にみかけ上縮んだり遅れたり増大したりするようにみえるだけで，実際は縮んだり遅れたり増大したりすることは起こらないのかということについて考える．今までの特殊相対性理論の解釈や，教科書や解説書，啓蒙書の記述では，すべて前者がとられており，実際に縮んだり遅れたり増大したりするという解釈であるが，ここでその実在的な解釈は誤りであって，観測的にみかけ上縮んだり遅れたり増大したりすると考えねばならないことを示す．元々そうなる（即ち縮んだり遅れたり増大する）と考えないと，相対性理論全体が一般相対性理論も含めて，実在の物理的世界を表さなくなってしまうということから，実際にそうなると解釈されているのであるが，これから議論していくようにそれは誤りであって，相対性理論は光にかかわるものを除いて実在の物理的世界を表すのではないのである．
まず長さの縮みについて，慣性系☆において静止している長さ☆は☆が長さ ☆の方向に慣性系☆に対して速度☆で運動するとき，慣性系☆からみると☆ に縮んで☆に観測される（☆へ写像される）ということである．即ち☆に縮んでいるのは☆に写された☆の☆のことであって☆そのものではないのである．これを今までの特殊相対性理論では☆の長さ☆そのものが静止から運動すると ☆に実際に縮む，と間違えているのである．長さの実在値は縮まないが観測値が縮むのであって，この実在と観測を混同して，観測値と同じく実在値も縮むとしているわけである．あるいは観測値が縮めばその向こうの実在値も縮むとして，みかけ上のものを実在のものと同一視しているのである．ここで速度というのは相対的なものであるから，☆から☆をみても同じことがいえる．.即ち☆に静止している長さ☆は☆からみると☆に縮んでみえる（☆に写像される）．.実際の☆の☆は縮んでいない．要するに相対速度☆の二つの慣性系から互いに相手をみると，実際には両方とも縮んでいないのであるが，互いに縮んでいるようにみえるということである．この実際には両方とも何ら縮んでいない，というところが本書と観測力学で新しくした重要なところであって今までの教科書や解説書，啓蒙書などには書かれていないことである．

結果 (英語) 1:

2.1 increasing the delay clock with a length contraction and mass Introduction to thinking about space (length, distance) and time (clock) and mass. When in the special theory of relativity, length ☆ stationary inertial objects the object stationary inertial speed Super motion, in the direction of motion, speed of light as ☆ ☆ the shrink (Lorentz contraction and) shortened to vertical motion and no compliance, ☆ remains unclear. Also late on when as well as in stationary inertial system clock ticks ☆, the watch stationary inertial speed Super motion, slowly ticking... When another object in a stationary inertial mass ☆, object stationary inertial velocity Super motion on increasing... Here grow to a mass of delay to watch or shrink to this length ☆ ☆ ☆, shrink really actual, real, or increases or, without the apparent observation on thinking about that won't shrink actually shrink, just looks or increases, delays, or increase. Apparent observation, interpretation of description and interpretation of the special theory of relativity ever, textbooks and manuals, enlightenment book, all are taken first, actually shrink, or increase, but here is a real interpretation of the mistake on the show that must be seen and shrink, to increase or... It originally (i.e. delayed the increase) and in relativity represent the real physical world except for those related to light, but actually would suggest that think, including general relativity theory of relativity as a whole, it is no longer represent real physical world is interpreted, by discussing it it errors and is not... In that shrinks when first for length contraction, in the inertial system ☆ still length ☆ ☆ length ☆ inertial system ☆ for speed Super axially, seen from the inertial system ☆ ☆ to ☆ observed (mapped to ☆). I.e. which is shrinking in the ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆ captured that, no ☆ itself. That is a mistake and this exercise from rest length ☆ ☆ is in the special theory of relativity ever ☆ actually shrivel up, and... Observations shrinks shrink the real value of the length of trying, confusing reality with observations, and observations as well as real value shrinks it. Or trying to shrink beyond real values observed 縮meba, apparent in real ones on the equate. Speed is a relative thing here, from ☆ ☆ sees the same can be said...... namely stationary ☆ length ☆ ☆ and ☆ the squashed, (on the map)...... not shrinks real ☆ ☆... In short is relative velocity ☆ two different inertial terms against each other, and in fact both shrinks not, looks are squashed together. That is important because it had this really, not any shrink both book and observed dynamics with new, unwritten ever of textbooks and manuals, enlightenment book, etc.

結果 (英語) 2:

2.1 length of the contraction and the clock delay and the mass of the increase
beginning in space (length and distance) and time (clock) think about the mass. In the special theory of relativity, when the length of the object in the still inertial system ☆ is that the object is moving at the speed ☆ against the still inertial system, in the direction of motion, the shrinkage in ☆ the speed of light as ☆ (Lorentz contraction c) shortened, the movement direction and the vertical direction remains no shrinking without ☆ in. The same tick of the clock in the still inertial system ☆, the watch is so chopped slowly late in ☆ when in motion at a speed ☆ against the still inertial system. Further object of mass ☆ is in the same stationary inertial system, increases ☆ when the object is moving at the speed ☆ against the still inertial system.
Here, the increase of delays and mass ☆ to the to the length of the ☆ shrinkage and watch ☆ is either really really realistic to shrink Dari delay or to increase or to those, observed manner is not the case Just it appears to be or to increase on a shrink Dari or delay apparent, actually think about the fact that what does not happen to be or increased or delay shrink. Interpretation and of the special theory of relativity up to now, textbooks and Reference, in the description of the enlightenment certificate, all has been taken is the former, it is the interpretation that or actually shrink Dari delay or increase, real that here interpretation is a mistake, to indicate that it must be considered or to delay or increase shrink the apparent observation manner. If you do not believe so made ​​originally (ie, contracted to increase or delay Dari), the entire theory of relativity is the general theory of relativity also be included, since it is that no longer represent the physical world of reality, it is actually Sonaruto interpretation While in than is that it as we discuss now be erroneous, relativity is not I represent the physical world of reality except those related to light.
For first of length contraction, when ☆ to have length ☆ the death stationary in inertial system ☆ exercise against inertial system ☆ at a speed ☆ in length ☆ direction of, shrinks to ☆ when viewed from the inertial system ☆ It is that the observed (mapped to ☆) to ☆. That's has shrunk to ☆ it is not something that ☆ be that photographed the ☆ Bruno ☆ of the ☆. This special is in the theory of relativity ☆ length of up to now ☆ itself is actually shrinks when you exercise ☆ from a stationary, it is of that mistake. The length of the real value of a than shrink but observed value does not shrink, and then confuse this reality and the observation, it is not as well have been the real value is also contracted with the observed value. Or as an observed value contracts also real value of the beyond if shortened, it is of being equated with those of the real thing on the apparent. Because here's that speed is relative, it can be said the same even look at the ☆ from ☆. . That length is stationary in ☆ ☆ it appears to shrink in ☆ when viewed from ☆ (is mapped to ☆). . Actual ☆ ☆ Bruno has not shrunk. In short, we look at the opponent each other from two of the inertial system of relative speed ☆, but is not yet shrunk actually both, it is that seems to shrink with each other. This fact to both of you do not shrink any, that place where textbooks and manual ever be a place important to the newly in this book and the observed dynamics, in such enlightenment certificate it is that it is not written.

結果 (英語) 3:

On the contraction and the length of the delay of the clock and 2.1 mass increases at the beginning (or long) and time (the clock) and the mass of the special theory of relativity ， stationary objects in inertial system, the length of the object to the static inertia system in - speed when the movement in the direction of motion ， ， and light - to - shrinkage (Lorentz contraction is shortened ，) remains in the movement direction and in the vertical direction, but also in any contract that the clock in the static inertia system, ，This is the same watch for the static inertia system in - speed moving slowly away, when the delay is more like the rest of objects in the inertial mass, ， object to the static inertia system in - speed motion is increased when the.
* the length of this here to watch, or shrink to the delays and mass - to - increasing ， actually really real, shrinking or to delay or increase ，But in the observational apparently look so as to increase the delay or contract only ， that might happen to increase in the contract or delay of ever think about the interpretation of the special theory of relativity and ， textbooks and manuals ， the book describes the ， ， and taken all the former ， interpretation is actually to increase the delay or contract and its interpretation ， here was a real errorShow that the idea is apparently increased delay or contract and shall be the original observational increases (i.e., delay or ， contract) I don't think that the whole theory of relativity and general relativity, including ， ， because that would reflect the physical the world of reality as it is ， are interpreted from this fact will be discussed as it was in the wrong ，.
is related to the theory of relativity is not in the light of the physical world, realFirst, the shrinkage of the length of the inertial system in ， * length * still * length in the direction of the inertial system for moving speed, when the ， observed in shrinking in the inertial system from * * and * (to be mapped) it is shrinking * with * in * * * that was not in itself is actually shrink ， until now in the special theory of relativity in * * length itself from rest to exercise and *And the mistake is ， and real value of length was observed not shrink shrink up to this reality and the observation ， observed value and the real value and the like are not shrink or observed value is reduced to shrink and its real value there is ， are identified as real and apparent from what is ， relative speed from here, I can say the same.It is still in the length from the happy look - and shrinking map (* * * really pissed off of the shrinking to each other in ， shrank not from the relative velocity of the two - and inertial ， against each other in practice both contracting is not that that is where ， and in fact this is not in any way both are shrinking at an important place in this document and dynamics observation until now have new textbooks and manuals ，It is not written in the book