YAMADAの価格が安いために、YAMADAはFHI内の多くのメンバー

YAMADAの価格が安いために、YAMADAはFHI内の多くのメンバーから注目されている。
推す声も多数聞かれるが、新規メーカーを採用するのはリスクが伴う。




2. 品質トラブルとコスト面から、NSKはかなり不利な状況。NSKを推す声は、設計担当者以外から聞こえてこない。
3. NSK実績があり、技術面の信頼も高いが、品質トラブルを起こして、なおかつ高コストでは、YAMADAとの比較の土台に上げられない。コストを下げれば比較の土台に上げる。

結果 (英語) 1:

For cheap price of YAMADA, YAMADA attention from many members of FHI.To adopt new manufacturers recommend voices are heard, but entails risk.2. quality issues and the cost is significantly disadvantaged NSK. NSK a voice is heard from design professionals.3. NSK experience, high technical confidence, causing quality problems, but at a high cost, not raised basis for comparison with the YAMADA. If we lower costs increase the basis for comparison.

結果 (英語) 2:

For the price of YAMADA is cheap, YAMADA has been attracting attention from a number of members of the FHI.
Voice is also heard many in pushing, but the risks involved to adopt a new manufacturer is. 2. From the quality trouble and cost, NSK is quite unfavorable situation. Voice in pushing the NSK is, not hear from other than the designer. 3. There is a NSK track record, but also high reliability of the technology surface, causing the quality trouble, and yet in the high-cost, not be raised on the base of comparison with the YAMADA. By lowering the cost increase to the base of comparison.

結果 (英語) 3:

Low price, YAMADA YAMADA from many members are in the FHI.But it was the voice of the masses, with the risk to adopt new manufacturers.From the cost and quality of the NSK disadvantage situation. I recommend NSK voice, I can not hear from the design.3. There NSK performance, high technology, reliable quality, high cost and trouble, and YAMADA not up on the base of comparison. To raise the lower cost on the base of comparison.