チャンドラ・モハンティは、第三世界女性に対する政治的そして言説的表象が

チャンドラ・モハンティは、第三世界女性に対する政治的そして言説的表象が女性たちに対する「同種化（homogenization）」を通じて生じているありさまを示した。
第三世界女性たちの生における物質的で歴史的な異種性（heterogeneities）を言説的に植民地化することはこうした「同種化」を通して始められ、このような植民地主義化を通して多様性を持った複数としての女性（women）は同種化され他者化され、単数としての（Woman）に固定化された。ここにおいて「歴史的主体としての女性（women）」とヘゲモニー的言説によって生産された「言説的女性（Woman）」の表象の間にはいかなる直接的アイデンティティーの関係もない。
西欧のフェミニストたちの文章に登場し始めた「第三世界女性」（Third World Woman）は単一の主体として表象されているが、この第三世界女性たちの平均値的イメージは「第三世界」が持っている無知、貧しさ、教育の無さ、伝統への束縛、家族志向的、被害者、などのイメージと、性的に制約されている女性というイメージが併合され形成されている。
単一な集合体としての「第三世界女性」を創出し表象することで第三世界の女性たちが具体的で複合的な主体であり
歴史的状況におかれた存在であることを無視し、相変わらず西欧が理論と実践において最も優先的な参考人となっている。こうした過程において第三世界の女性に対する西欧フェミニストたちの「言説的植民地化」が始められたのだった。

結果 (英語) 1:

Chandra Mohanty, against the No. 3 world women politically and showed the plight causing women who "kind of (homogenization)" through discourse representation.Initiated through this kind of material, historical heterogeneity in ' the third world women (heterogeneities) colonization of a discourse that, through such as colonial landowners righteousness of diversity with multiple women (women) is similar, others grouped as singular (Woman) to the immobilized. No identity in any direct relationship between representation here were produced by women as a historical subject (women) and the hegemonic discourse, discourse of female (Woman).Started to appear in the writings of Western feminists No. third world women (Third World Woman) is represented as a single entity, but is the No. 3 world women who average value of image to the lack of "third world" is ignorance, poverty, education, traditions, family oriented, women are bound to sexual images, such as victims, and that image is merged, has been formed.As a single aggregate no. third world women to create a representation of an third world women in specific and complex subject.Ignoring that is placed in the historical context is still Western Europe in theory and practice and witness the most preferred. In such a process of the woman of the third world to Western feminists "discourse of colonization" was launched.

結果 (英語) 2:

Chandra Mohanti showed the plight of political and discursive representations to the third world women has occurred through the "same kind of (homogenization)" for women.
It was started through the "same kind of" that way to discursive colonized material historical heterogeneity the (heterogeneities) in the production of third world women, to have a diversity through such colonialism of As women more the (women) are others of the same type of and immobilized (Woman) as a single. There is no relationship of any direct identity between the representation of the "woman as a historical subject (women)" and has been produced by the hegemonic discourse "discursive woman (Woman)" in here.
It began to appear in the text of the feminists of Western Europe "Third World women" (Third World Woman) but are representation as a single entity, the average value imagery of this third world women "third world "have ignorance, poverty, lack of education, bound to tradition, family-oriented, and the image of the victim, such as the image of women who have been sexually constraints have been merged form.
Women of the third world is a complex subject and specifically by creating a "third world woman" as a single aggregate representation
to ignore that it is a presence that has been placed in the historical situation , as usual Western Europe has become the most preferential witness in theory and practice. Western feminists for third world women "discursive colonization" seemed to have been started in this process.

結果 (英語) 3:

The political and チャンドラ・モハンティ against third world women against women in our discourse representation (homogenization) "state has occurred. In different historical material in women at the third world (heterogeneities was such a "homogeneous" through the discourse to colonize this colonialism through diversity with a plurality of women women), and others of the sameSingular (Woman) immobilized. Here is the "historical subject and the woman (women) produced by female hegemony discourse" (Woman discourse of "representation of the relationship between the identity of any direct. At the third world "of the Western feminist women began to appear in the text" (Third World Woman) is represented as a single entity, ignorance, "third world" have a poor image of the average value of women in the third world,Education is not the traditional family oriented, bound to the victims, and the image is formed by combining the image of women and sexually as constraints. At a single representation to create "third world" as a set of women in the third world, specifically in a subject is at the historical situation in which there are ignored, as the western theory and the most as a priority for reference in practice.It was the western feminists on women in the third world in the process of "start" colonial discourse.