1. YAMADAの価格が安いためFHI内の注目度が高く、推す声も多数

1. YAMADAの価格が安いためFHI内の注目度が高く、推す声も多数聞かれるが、
新規メーカーを採用するのはリスクが伴う。
2. 品質トラブルとコスト面から、NSKはかなり不利な状況。
NSKを推す声は、設計担当者以外から聞こえてこない。
3. NSK実績があり、技術面の信頼も高いが、
品質トラブルを起こして、なおかつ高コストでは、
YAMADAとの比較の土台に上げられない。
コストを下げれば比較の土台に上げる。

結果 (英語) 1:

Asked if too many voices for the cheap price of YAMADA in the FHI is high, can tell by 1.To adopt a new company involves risk.2. quality issues and the cost is significantly disadvantaged NSK.NSK a voice is heard from design professionals.3. NSK experience, high technical reliability,With the high cost, and causing quality problems, aDo not raise the basis for comparison with the YAMADA.If we lower costs increase the basis for comparison.

結果 (英語) 2:

1. Because the price of YAMADA cheap high degree of attention in the FHI, but heard many voices in pushing,
accompanied by risk is to adopt a new manufacturer.
2. From the quality trouble and cost, NSK is quite unfavorable situation.
Voice in pushing the NSK is, not hear from other than the designer.
3. There is a NSK track record, but also high reliability of the technology surface,
causing the quality trouble, and yet in the high-cost,
not be raised on the base of comparison with the YAMADA.
By lowering the cost increase to the base of comparison.